Example Answers for a Competency Portfolio

The following example answers are provided to help guide you through the membership application process. They illustrate the level of detail, clarity, and professionalism that we encourage applicants to demonstrate when completing their responses. While these examples reflect strong approaches, they are not intended to be copied directly. Every applicant’s background and experience are unique, and your answers should accurately represent your own work, learning, and perspective.

 

Using these examples can help you:

  • Understand the types of information that strengthen an application.
  • Recognize the balance between being concise and providing sufficient detail.
  • Gain confidence in presenting your experience and qualifications clearly.

 

By reviewing these examples, you can better prepare thoughtful, well-structured responses that highlight your skills and align with the standards of the Association.

 

Note: Examples are currently only available for Practitioner applications, examples for other categories are being developed.

 

Accordion

Avalanche Practitioner

Patrol Examples

Our operation primarily uses InfoEx as the central digital platform for avalanche forecasting and operational record keeping. Each control team member has a login and is responsible for entering field data throughout the day, including avalanche observations, weather conditions, and snowpack assessments. 


Forecasters hold moderator privileges and review submissions before sharing selected information with the broader InfoEx network. This ensures data quality and relevance while maintaining operational confidentiality where needed. 

We rely on InfoEx not only for documentation but also as a key decision-support tool, aligning with the Conceptual Model of Avalanche Hazard. The system allows us to track trends, compare observations, and inform daily hazard assessments. 



Additionally, internal InfoEx data is accessible to off-duty patrollers, enabling them to stay informed about evolving snowpack conditions and avalanche hazards. This supports continuity in decision-making and enhances team-wide situational awareness. 

Our operation also uses a safety form platform known as Site Docs, which synthesizes all safety components for an operational day and shares these with our operational manager. Our daily forms include a field level hazard assessment form and an equipment inspection form (pre- and post-use). These documents are shared within the specific field team for the day, and each member must review and sign them before engaging in the activity. 

 

Our workplace relies on strong interdepartmental networks—including patrol, lift operations, grooming, and outdoor operations—to ensure safe and efficient mountain management. InfoEx serves as our central platform for sharing snowpack information, which is critical not only for patrol but also for other departments making terrain and scheduling decisions. 

We categorize and share data as follows: 

  • Class 1: Avalanche observations. 
  • Class 2: Snow profiles and hazard ratings. 
  • Class 3: Weather observations. 

This information feeds into a run list that indicates open or closed status for each zone. The nighttime snowcat crew uses this list to avoid exposure to forecasted hazards, while departments like lift operations and guest services reference it to anticipate potential delays to our standard 9:00 AM alpine opening. 

Our patrol team forms the backbone of our human network for avalanche hazard management. We use radio communication to relay real-time observations of unstable snow, avalanche activity, and weather changes. When primary channels are congested, we switch to alternate frequencies to ensure critical information is transmitted without delay. 

This integrated system of digital tools and human communication allows us to maintain situational awareness across departments and respond quickly to changing conditions. 



At the start of last season, I led a practical avalanche search and rescue training session as part of our patrol team’s early-season onboarding at Candy Mountain Resort. The audience consisted of both returning and new patrollers, and the session was designed to reinforce core safety protocols and hands-on rescue techniques. 

The briefing covered several key topics: 

  • Avalanche safety equipment standards required by our organization. 
  • Proper transceiver use, including how to wear the device and maintain minimum separation distances from electronic interference (e.g., mobile phones). 
  • Search strategies, with practical exercises in: 
    • Recco system use 
    • Multiple transceiver searches 
    • Probing and shoveling techniques
    • Communication protocols within an incident command structure 

The session emphasized both technical proficiency and team coordination, ensuring patrollers were confident in their roles during a rescue scenario. It also served as a refresher on best practices and helped build cohesion among the team before the operational season began. 


 

 

Guide Examples

I function effectively within my organization by understanding my role, respecting its boundaries, and contributing to team objectives. As a ski patroller at various locations, I carried out daily responsibilities such as marking hazards, completing documentation, assisting guests, and providing first aid when needed. These tasks were performed in coordination with the broader patrol team to ensure safe and efficient mountain operations. 

While assisting with snow safety at Mount Kiwi in New Zealand, I was mindful of my position as an observer. I focused on learning from the experience and contributed during debriefings by sharing insights, without overstepping into decision-making roles. 

In my role as a tail guide for both cat and heli-ski operations, I worked closely with the guiding team by participating in morning briefings and end-of-day discussions. My primary responsibility was to ensure all guests arrived safely at the lead guide’s regroup location. If a guest was struggling, I communicated via radio to confirm their safety and coordinate with the lead guide. 

I also performed snowpack and weather observations and completed other tasks assigned by the guiding team. I was careful not to assume lead guide responsibilities, such as selecting skiable terrain or performing ski cuts. Additionally, I supported logistical tasks like loading guest equipment onto the cat and keeping guests engaged while guides discussed terrain management strategies. 


At both cat and heli-ski operations, avalanche hazard forecasts and the operational field plan are central to terrain decision-making. These tools guide our daily run list discussions, where we assess which zones are appropriate based on current conditions. When faced with challenging scenarios—such as heavy snowfall and wind loading—guides typically opt for simpler terrain with minimal avalanche exposure. More complex terrain requires additional data, which may involve sending a dedicated snow safety team to conduct stability tests before entry. 

Terrain shape and features play a critical role in identifying avalanche problems. We pay close attention to lee slopes, convexities, long planar slopes, and steep terrain, as these are more prone to instability. Micro-terrain features are also used to gather information in real time—for example, ski cuts on small convex rolls can reveal localized instability without significant exposure. 

I’ve carried these practices into my personal touring days, where I assess slope choices by considering: 

  • The current avalanche hazard forecast 
  • Likely avalanche size and probability 
  • Terrain consequences and runout zones 

Using the forecast and field plan, we identify hazard-prone areas in advance and build a guiding framework around them. However, safe travel requires constant observation, terrain reassessment, and dynamic decision-making. Understanding which terrain features are most likely to produce avalanches allows us to select safe zones for digging, ski cutting, and guest travel. 

In my role, I support the guiding team by contributing to discussions when I can add value—whether through observations, terrain suggestions, or group management strategies. By maintaining large margins of safety and carefully managing group movement when those margins narrow, we’re able to move guests through serious terrain safely and effectively. 


  As a tail guide, I helped identify elements at risk—including guests, staff, snowcats, and helicopters—by assessing terrain exposure in relation to the current avalanche hazard. Each day began with a safety briefing where we communicated the forecasted conditions and outlined the specific hazards we’d be managing. This ensured that both staff and guests understood the risks and the rationale behind our terrain choices. 

Guests often asked why certain slopes were off-limits, especially when conditions appeared favorable. I took time to explain that, based on the forecast and our field observations, the likelihood of avalanche activity was elevated. As conditions worsened—due to factors like wind loading or persistent weak layers—our terrain options narrowed. Sometimes only specific lines within a run remained viable, and we adjusted our objectives accordingly. 

My role in communicating hazards involved supporting the lead guide by reinforcing key messages and offering relatable examples from past experiences to help guests understand the decision-making process. I emphasized transparency and encouraged questions, which helped build trust and foster a shared commitment to safety. 

When the avalanche forecast indicated increased risk, I supported changes to our operational plan by helping manage guest movement, suggesting alternate terrain options, and maintaining clear communication. By staying within my scope and contributing to group discussions, I helped ensure that our team could adapt effectively while keeping everyone informed and safe. 



 

Sled Examples

  As an AST assistant instructor, our curriculum emphasizes how human factors contribute to errors in avalanche terrain, both in the classroom and out in the field. During field days, we regularly explore backcountry decision-making and the role of cognitive bias. 

Common discussions include how a difficult trail ride can trigger a “scarcity” mindset, pushing riders toward riskier terrain in search of good snow. We also examine “expert halo” scenarios, where deep, challenging snow may cause the lead rider to overlook terrain exposure, influencing the group's assessment of safety. 

We highlight how group composition affects behavior and stress the importance of recognizing and managing group dynamics to reduce risky choices. Students are encouraged to independently assess conditions and use the Avaluator to support their decisions. 

On guided snowmobile tours, I initiate conversations with coworkers about where they sit on the stress continuum—starting with my own check-in to foster openness. This practice increases awareness of human factors and helps us adapt our field plans accordingly. 


  When guiding or assisting AST instruction, we regularly use Gaia GPS in the field as part of our morning workflow. We establish travel routes and identify slopes suitable for teaching, as well as terrain to avoid based on current weather and avalanche conditions. 

We rely on several types of stationary work sites to support learning and data collection: 

  • Study plots are located in non-avalanche terrain, allowing access even under high or extreme hazard. These sites are chosen for snowpack conditions that reflect nearby start zones without exposing personnel to risk. 
  • Snow profile sites are selected based on the avalanche forecast and operational field plan. I prioritize safe locations that yield relevant data outside of avalanche terrain. If digging within avalanche terrain is necessary, I ensure a spotter is posted in a safe location and only proceed when the expected avalanche size is 1.5 or smaller. 
  • Teaching zones for AST courses, such as companion rescue practice areas, are pre-identified in non-avalanche terrain to ensure safety. During scenario exercises, I remain vigilant to prevent participants from drifting into consequential terrain. 
  • This approach allows us to meet instructional objectives while maintaining a strong margin of safety. 

 

Hazard communication begins with our morning meeting, where the team aligns on the day’s forecast, terrain concerns, and messaging for guests. When guests arrive, we walk them through the avalanche bulletin, outline the hazards we’ll be managing together, and set a serious tone to ensure clarity and shared understanding. This process helps establish a unified mindset before heading into the field. 

Once in the field, I verify conditions against the forecast. If discrepancies arise, I notify the lead guide, and we adjust our field plan to remain within operational risk tolerance—typically by increasing restrictions on high-consequence terrain. I’m transparent with guests about these changes, explaining the rationale and encouraging them to prioritize safety. My goal is to foster voluntary buy-in rather than impose decisions, even when adjustments are necessary. On AST courses, we treat these moments as learning opportunities, reinforcing the importance of field verification in the decision-making process. 

When I worked as an assistant guide, our primary elements at risk included guests, staff, and snowmobiles. During safety briefings, we clearly communicated the day’s hazards and explained terrain closures based on current conditions. Guests often asked why certain slopes were off-limits, and I used relatable examples from past experiences to help them understand the elevated avalanche risk. As conditions worsened, our terrain options narrowed to areas with lower consequence potential, and we adjusted accordingly. 

 

Box 2759, 110 MacKenzie Ave
Revelstoke, BC Canada, V0E 2S0
Find us
Tel 250-837-2435
Fax 866-366-2094
Contact us
Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal